Watched this late last night. I’ve seen this a number of times but never reviewed it on my old film blog for some reason… plus this was my first time seeing it in HD (Murnau Foundation restoration), and I think that actually did make a difference to my appreciation of it. One of the film’s primary features was, of course, the wild Expressionist design by Hans Poelzig, and I think it’s fitting that his credit (at least in this restoration) comes immediately after that of the two directors, cos he really was the MVP of this film, way ahead of any of the human performers… Anyway, the scene is medieval Prague, where the Jews have been given their marching orders by the emperor; community leader Rabbi Löw, meanwhile, is messing with some kind of dark forces and working on the titular creature. Will the Golem be the saviour of the Prague ghetto? Or will it be a bigger problem than Löw expected? No prizes for guessing, of course… I found myself enjoying this rather more than I have done in the past; I always liked The Golem without ever really loving it, but I definitely get it a lot more now that it’s so much clearer in high-def. I do remain a bit perplexed by a couple of things, mainly the romance between the rabbi’s daughter and the emperor’s emissary:

I mean, do YOU see the chemistry radiating between those two? Cos damned if I ever have… But this is the other thing I’ve never got:

This comes from the scene in which the Golem is brought to life (the film’s later influence on the 1931 Frankenstein is most obvious here), with the rabbi having been given the magic word which he writes on a strip of parchment then, as we see, he puts it into the amulet thing that animates the Golem. This isn’t a close-up, though, as we’d understand it, in that the film doesn’t cut from a longer shot to a closer one; this is one continous shot of the rabbi and his assistant Famulus carrying the inanimate Golem into the middle of the chamber in long shot, with the rabbi then approaching the camera for the close-up, then going back. I’ve always been a bit baffled by this; I know from having studied early film history that staging in depth and in long shot was the default mode of early cinema, this is how a film made in 1905 or so would’ve handled this business… but this is a film made in 1920, so this was already massively dated even then, most films would’ve just cut to the close-up. I’ve always wondered why Wegener and/or Boese did it this way, and I am almost certainly the only person who ever has.

As I was saying about the design, though. LOOK AT THAT. The illustration of the buildings in the film poster is one thing, but these were real, and BUILT. Goddamn. Hadn’t seen The Golem in years, delightful to revisit it at last…
You must be logged in to post a comment.